Drawing for PHILOSOPHY

USPTO serial 75839087

PHILOSOPHY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEVINE, HOWARD B
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PHILOSOPHY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark A. Carlino

MARK A CARLINO LAW OFFICE OF MARK A. CARLINO, PC10115 E BELL RD STE 107 PMB 601SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85260UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
026Hair bows; bows for gift wrapping; ornamental novelty buttonsACTIVE—
027Plastic or rubber bath mats; door mats of wood or India rubber; straw matsACTIVE—
033Drinking and cooking wineACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 16, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 1, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 12, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 15, 2003EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 15, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 2, 2003EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 2, 2003EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 2, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 30, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 11, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 5, 2002EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 5, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 3, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 19, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 12, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 12, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 5, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 5, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 19, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 27, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 14, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 29, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 26, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 29, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 21, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance