Drawing for 24 HOUR FITNESS

USPTO serial 75839113

24 HOUR FITNESS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FINE, STEVEN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with 24 HOUR FITNESS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Donald L. Beeson

DONALD L BEESONONE KAISER PLZ STE 2360OAKLAND, CA 94612UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041health club services; instruction services, namely instruction in the field of health and physical exerciseACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 5, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 30, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 8, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 17, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 25, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 2, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 20, 2001PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 24, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 7, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 4, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 23, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 3, 1999PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance