USPTO serial 75839129
I-TRAIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOYNER, CHARLES G
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with I-TRAIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santa Barbara, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Valerie du Laney
VALERIE DU LANEY MILLER, NASH LLP4400 TWO UNION SQ601 UNION STSEATTLE, WA 98101-2352Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | business consulting services for managing and coordinating all of the services software and systems offered by the applicant to the automotive industry, for suppliers to the automotive industry, and for related industries | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 31, 2003 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 23, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |