USPTO serial 75839316
LAMON BREWSTER "RELENTLESS"
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LAMON BREWSTER "RELENTLESS"?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Sherman Oaks, CA
Sherman Oaks, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD J. GREENSTONE
RICHARD J GREENSTONE ATTORNEYS & COUNSELORS AT LAWSTE 300465 CALIFORNIA STSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | paper, cardboard and goods made from these, namely, exercise books, or guide books about boxing, reference books about nutrition, comic books, mounted photographs, unmounted photographs, stationery; typewriters; pens; pencils; markers; playing cards; sports trading cards; posters; portraits; paper pennants; flags; decals; stickers; calendars; sport magazines, nutritional magazines, health magazines, Sports, health and nutrition newsletters, sports, health and nutrition books, informational brochures about sports, health and nutrition and a boxer's fan club magazine; a boxer's fan club newsletter; paper machine figurines; telephone calling cards not magnetically encoded; motivational books | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 17, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 25, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 30, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 12, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 30, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 30, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 7, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 6, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 11, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 7, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |