USPTO serial 75839595
DIRECT TO HOME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HERMAN, RUSS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DIRECT TO HOME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANTHONY R KINNEY
ANTHONY R KINNEY SENNIGER POWERS LEAVITT & ROEDEL1 METROPOLITAN SQ 16TH FLST LOUIS, MO 63102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | computer ordering software; television broadcasting services; banking and financial services rendered via a global computer network; credit card clearing services; auction services rendered via a global computer network; wireless communication services, namely, digital messaging services, electronic voice messaging services, namely, the recording, storage, and subsequent transmission of voice message by telephone; video conferencing transmission and facsimile transmission services; electronic mail services, namely, establishing accounts and passwords for others; and retail and wholesale sales in the field of consumer, business, and industrial products and services by means of a computer network, a global computer network, by mail, courier, telephone and facsimile, including creating, maintaining, and providing access to an electronic data base | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 2, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |