Drawing for FRUITFULL FUN POPS

USPTO serial 75839649

FRUITFULL FUN POPS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WELLS, CHRISTOPHER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FRUITFULL FUN POPS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Carolyn E. Knecht

CAROLYN E KNECHT FOLEY & LARDNERONE IBM PLZ330 N WABASH AVE STE 3300CHICAGO, IL 60611-3603

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Frozen fruit smoothies, frozen fruit bars, ice cream, and frozen yogurtACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 25, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 25, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 11, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 14, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 11, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Mar 11, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 14, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 30, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 23, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 24, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 8, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 8, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 25, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 2, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 2, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 14, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 29, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 28, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 17, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 9, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 21, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 24, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 27, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 12, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 10, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance