Drawing for IHOME

USPTO serial 75839811

IHOME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRYAN JOHNSON, HELLEN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IHOME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bernhard Kreten

BERNHARD KRETEN BERNHARD KRETEN ESQ & ASSOCIATES1331 GARDEN HWY STE 300SACRAMENTO, CA 95833UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006house mark for interior and exterior metal building materials and products used to fabricate a building structure in which the materials and products are "green", ie, efficient and originate in whole or in part from recycled materials and products, the recycled materials and products are primarily formed from steel and/or aluminum, namely, building materials and products, namely, bars, beams, cables, casements, castings, chimneys, cladding, doors, ducts, expansion joints, fencing, flashing, flooring, framing, garage doors, gaskets, gate stops, girders, gratings, gutters, handles, hinges, hooks, joists, knobs, latches, nails, panels, pipes, posts, runners, sashes, seals, shims, shutters, siding, staircases, staples, tiles, valves, vent covers, and wainscottingACTIVE—
019house mark for interior and exterior non-metal building materials and products used to fabricate a building structure in which the materials and products are "green", i e, efficient and originate in whole or in part from recycled materials and products, the recycled materials and products are primarily formed from glass, plastics, fiber and/or wood products, namely, beams, blocks, boards, bricks, casements, casings, castings, cement, chimneys, doors, drainpipes, ducts, flooring, framing, gates, girders, gutters, joints, joists, knockers, lumber, moldings, panels, pipes, plywood, posts, roofing, shutters, siding, stones, tiles, trellises, and trestlesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 24, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 24, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 11, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 16, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 16, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 28, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 15, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 15, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 15, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 29, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 13, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 13, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 29, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 14, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 14, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 16, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 23, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 3, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 28, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 11, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 26, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 26, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 23, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 18, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 18, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 9, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 15, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 15, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 1, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 10, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 7, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 20, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 15, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 11, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 11, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance