USPTO serial 75839837
ULTRA Q
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PINO, BRIAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ULTRA Q?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patrick D. Floyd
STEPHEN P EVANS MARSHALL & MELHORN, LLCFOUR SEAGATEEIGHTH FLTOLEDO, OH 43604Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Automobile and truck parts, namely brake rotors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 3, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 20, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 18, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 5, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 17, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 23, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 18, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 13, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 4, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 16, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 8, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 12, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 30, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 10, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 25, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |