USPTO serial 75839849
DIGIMON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLS, CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DIGIMON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANGELA SMALL
MONIQUE Y CHENG ABC FAMILY WORLDWIDE INC500 S BUENA VISTA STBURBANK, CA 91521-0665UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing, namely, warm up suits, jogging suits, sweat suits, sweat pants and sweat shirts, bodysuits, leotards, tights, leg warmers, leggings, rompers, singlets, wet suits, ski suits, ski pants, ski bibs, ski jackets, swimwear, bathing suits, beach and bathing coverups, suits, slacks, trousers, pants, jeans, shorts, sweat shorts, gym shorts, tops, coats, sport coats, shirts, sport shirts, t-shirts, knit shirts, polo shirts, pullovers, sweaters, vests, tank tops, jumpsuits, playsuits, jackets, overcoats, parkas, wind resistant jackets, leather jackets, skirts, dresses, footwear, shoes, boots, slippers, athletic footwear, basketball shoes, casual footwear, sandals, head wear, hats, caps, visors, hoods, berets, head bands, sweat bands, wrist bands, ear muffs, neckwear, neckties, neckerchieves, scarves, bandannas, sleepwear, robes, pajamas, nightshirts, rainwear, gloves, mittens, galoshes, loungewear, underwear, briefs, underpants, boxer shorts, cloth diapers, undershirts, suspenders, hosiery, socks, belts, masquerade and Halloween costumes and aprons | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 5, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 8, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |