USPTO serial 75839877
DESIGN STUDIO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 3, 2004
- Examiner
- WOOD, CAROLINE
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DESIGN STUDIO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Alias/Wavefront, a Division of Silicon Graphics Limited
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Other trademarks owned by Alias/Wavefront, a Division of Silicon Graphics Limited
Alias/Wavefront, a Division of Silicon Graphics Limited
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Other trademarks owned by Alias/Wavefront, a Division of Silicon Graphics Limited
MENLO PARK, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David E. Sipiora
DAVID E SIPIORA TOWNSEND & TOWNSEND & CREW LLPTWO EMBARCADERO CTR 8TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software with modeling, animation and rendering capabilities for use by industrial designers in creating and visualizing two-dimensional and three-dimensional models | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 31, 1999 |
| 041 | training in computer graphic design | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 31, 1999 |
| 042 | consulting with respect to computer graphics; computer software design for others; computer graphic design | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 31, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Alias/Wavefront, a Division of Silicon Graphics Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Alias/Wavefront, a Division of Silicon Graphics Limited
- Other trademarks owned by ALIAS SYSTEMS CORP.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named DESIGN STUDIO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 9, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 24, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Dec 4, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 6, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 22, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2002 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |