USPTO serial 75841647
WHY WOULDN'T YOU?
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUSH, KAREN K
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WHY WOULDN'T YOU??
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Irvington, NY
Irvington, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen D. Kahn
STEPHEN D KAHN WEIL GOTSHAL AND MANGES767 5TH AVE FL CONC1NEW YORK, NY 10153-0119UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic and video game cartridges, software, CD-ROMs, and interactive remote control units, featuring interactive games | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | series of books regarding global computer networks, searching and retrieving information from sites therein and concerning other resources on computer networks; other publications, namely newsletters and magazines regarding global computer networks, searching and retrieving information from sites therein and concerning other resources on computer networks; and posters | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Toys, namely traditional, video and electronic hand-held games | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Financial services, namely banking, credit card, debit card and/or pre-paid card services offered through cards containing stored value, and bill payment services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by iWon, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by iWon, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named WHY WOULDN'T YOU?
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 5, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 20, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 20, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 20, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 28, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 8, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 3, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 15, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |