Drawing for THINKOFFICE

USPTO serial 75841763

THINKOFFICE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DWYER, JOHN D
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THINKOFFICE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Randy Lipsitz

RANDY LIPSITZ KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP919 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-3852UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software used for marketing the products and services of others via a global computer network, and instruction manuals therefor provided as a unit; and computer software for facilitating payment for the products and services of others, namely computer e-commerce software to allow users to perform electronic business transactions via a global computer network, and instruction manuals therefor provided as a unitACTIVE—
035Marketing and advertising services, namely promoting the goods and services of others by placing advertisements and promotional displays in an electronic site accessed via a global computer network; providing a computerized online searchable database featuring listings of, directories of, and the means to contact experts in a wide variety of fields; providing a computerized online searchable database featuring listings of, directories of, and the means to contact potential buyers and sellers in electronic commerce transactions; and providing an online electronic commerce website which facilitates the bidding for, negotiation of, and contracting with respect to business transactions between buyers and sellers of goods and services on the InternetACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 11, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 27, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 4, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 15, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 12, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 19, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 19, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 23, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 23, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 16, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance