USPTO serial 75841823
FILECABINET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REGAN, JOHN B
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FILECABINET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THOMAS W. COOK
THOMAS W COOKP O BOX 19893030 BRIDGEWAY, STE 425SAUSALITO, CA 94965Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE, NAMELY, SOFTWARE IN THE FIELD OF DATA ENCRYPTION FOR USE IN SECURED TRANSMITTING AND RECEIVING OF COMPUTER FILES VIA A GLOBAL NETWORK OF COMPUTERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 18, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 29, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 21, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 11, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 29, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 9, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 29, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |