USPTO serial 75841880
GLAMOURPRO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS, AMY E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GLAMOURPRO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Lake Oswego, OR
Lake Oswego, OR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PETER VAUGHN SHAVER
621 SW MORRISON ST STE 1417PORTLAND, OR 97205UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Modeling agency | ACTIVE | Mar 7, 2002 |
| 041 | Educational services, namely, conducting conferences in the field of hair care, self improvement, modeling and professional make-up and distributing course materials in connection therewith and educational services in the nature of beauty schools and self-improvement schools for models; entertainment in the nature of beauty pageants, fashion shows and competitions in the fields of hair styling and hair cuttings; conducting entertainment exhibitions in the nature of hair styling and hair coloring awards; and publication of books and magazines | ACTIVE | Mar 7, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 8, 2004 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 19, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 2, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| May 15, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 20, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 26, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 4, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 2, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 30, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 24, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |