USPTO serial 75842065
SCHLEMMER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 5, 2002
- Examiner
- FISHER, LATONIA
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SCHLEMMER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
D-85586 POING, DE
C.P. 72100 Puebla, Pue, MX
C.P. 72100 Puebla, Pue, MX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CATHRYN A. BERRYMAN
CATHRYN A. BERRYMAN WINSTEAD PCP.O. BOX 50784DALLAS, TX 75250-0784UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SCHLEMMER GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by RUBIO, JOSE MANUEL
- Other trademarks owned by RUBIO, JOSE MANUEL
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Similar marks named SCHLEMMER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 2012 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Feb 26, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 10, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 5, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Nov 14, 2001 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 14, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 13, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |