Drawing for SWIFTCOMM

USPTO serial 75842214

SWIFTCOMM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BALDWIN, SCOTT
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SWIFTCOMM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian D. Anderson,

BRIAN D ANDERSON OBLON SPIVAK MCCLELLAND MAIER & NEUSTADT1940 DUKE STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION DEVICES AND OTHER TELECOMMUNICATION DEVICES, NAMELY RADIO TRANSMITTERS AND RECEIVERS FOR TWO-WAY RADIOS, CELLULAR PAGERS, COMPUTERS, SERVERS, FIREWALLS, ROUTERS, HUBS, WIRELESS TELEPHONES, WIRELESS COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT, NAMELY RADIO BASE STATIONS, MOBILE RADIO STATIONS, MODEMS, BATTERIES, BATTERY CHARGERS, COMPACT DESKTOP CHARGING STANDS, WIRELESS MICROPHONES, WIRELESS HEADPHONES, WIRELESS AUDIO TRANSMITTERS AND WIRELESS AUDIO RECEIVERS; ELECTRONIC APPLIED APPLIANCES AND PARTS THEREFOR, NAMELY, ANTENNAS, POWER AMPLIFIERS, DIGITAL TEMPERATURE COMPENSATED CRYSTAL OSCILLATORS, VOLTAGE CONTROLLED OSCILLATORS, ISOLATORS, SAW FILTERS, DIGITAL FILTERS, DIGITAL SIGNAL PROCESSORS, LARGE SCALE INTEGRATED CIRCUITSACTIVEJun 17, 1999
038Electronic transmission of data, namely, telematics and telemetering via computer terminals; providing multiple-user wireless access to Internet; wireless and cellular telephone services, telex communication, telegram transmission, telephone communication, facsimile transmission, and paging servicesACTIVEJun 17, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 31, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Aug 31, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 31, 2005LOAPLETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED—
Aug 31, 2005ATRQATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED—
Jul 22, 2005CRTPREG. CANCELLED - RESTORED TO PENDENCY—
Mar 8, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 6, 2004ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Sep 13, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 15, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 25, 2003ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 19, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 29, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 16, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jun 4, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 15, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 28, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 25, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 5, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 31, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 30, 2001IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
May 29, 2001AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 28, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 21, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 21, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 15, 2000IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Aug 15, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 21, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 14, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance