USPTO serial 75842393
REPAIR WOOD FOR GOOD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2765837Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 16, 2003
- Examiner
- BUSH, KAREN K
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with REPAIR WOOD FOR GOOD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
HENKEL CONSUMER ADHESIVES, INC.
AVON, OH
HENKEL CONSUMER ADHESIVES, INC.
AVON, OH
Rocky Hill, CT
Avon, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christel Emerson
Amy Span WergelesLaw Department - TrademarksOne Henkel WayRocky Hill, CT 06067Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Adhesives for use in home and building construction, renovation, maintenance and repair | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 1999 |
| 002 | Wood filler compounds, namely, resin-based filler and hardener, for use in home and building construction, renovation, maintenance and repair | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HENKEL CONSUMER ADHESIVES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by HENKEL CONSUMER ADHESIVES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by HENKEL CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by MANCO, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Similar marks named REPAIR WOOD FOR GOOD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 27, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 27, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 13, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 23, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 23, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 23, 2003 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 12, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 6, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |