USPTO serial 75842698
PERFECT SERVICE INC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PERFECT SERVICE INC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence J. Siskind
LAWRENCE J SISKIND COOPER, WHITE & COOPER201 CALIFORNIA ST 17TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | automobile cleaning, body repair, finishing, and detailing; automobile maintenance; cleaning of clothing, carpets, upholstery, draperies, fabrics, and household items; dry cleaning; repair of windows and household items; painting and pressure- washing decks and fences; maintenance of swimming pools; window cleaning; and termite and pest control | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 1999 |
| 039 | chauffeur services; document delivery; food delivery; limousine services; message delivery; and pharmaceutical delivery | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 1999 |
| 042 | butler services; beauty salon services; catering; gardening; personal gift selection for others; gift wrapping; greenhouse services; house sitting; kennel services; lawn care; locksmithing; manicuring; massage; party planning consultation; pedicuring; providing banquet and social function facilities for special events and occasions; personal inventorying by means of creating an image and written file of household items for security and insurance purposes; tree surgery; weed killing; waste removal | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 8, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 6, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |