USPTO serial 75842794
LIFE-SAVER SERIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2942295Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 19, 2005
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LIFE-SAVER SERIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CAMARILLO, CA
Camarillo, CA
CAMARILLO, CA
Camarillo, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LOYE M. BARTON
LOYE M BARTON NORMAN DOWLER ET AL840 COUNTY SQ DRVENTURA, CA 93003-5406UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Series of medical forms for recording important medical and emergency information | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 24, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NEMETSCHEK, CHRISTINE
- Other trademarks owned by OLSON, CHRISTINE
- Other trademarks owned by NEMETSCHEK, CHRISTINE
- Other trademarks owned by OLSON, CHRISTINE
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named LIFE-SAVER SERIES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 24, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 16, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 15, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2004 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2004 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 10, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 18, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 3, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 10, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 29, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 23, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 19, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 6, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 13, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 28, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Dec 19, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 27, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |