USPTO serial 75842856
KINGSFORD PRO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, TERESA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KINGSFORD PRO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joel J. Hayashida
JOEL J HAYASHIDA THE CLOROX COMPANY1221 BROADWAYOAKLAND, CA 94612UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | TOUCH UP PAINT FOR BARBECUE GRILLS | ACTIVE | — |
| 003 | DEGREASING COMPOSITION PREPARATIONS NOT USED IN MANUFACTURING PROCESSES FOR USE ON BARBECUE GRILLS | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | BARBECUE UTENSILS, NAMELY, LONG HANDLE FORKS, TONGS, SKEWERS AND TURNERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | FITTED BARBECUE GRILL COVERS AND TOPS; BARBECUE ROTISSERIES; LIGHTERS PRIMARILY FOR LIGHTING GRILLS, FIREPLACES, CANDLES AND BARBECUES; BARBECUE LIGHTING CHIMNEYS, NAMELY, THICK GAUGE METAL TUBES WITH INTEGRAL HANDLE AND INTERIOR GRATE USED TO LIGHT CHARCOAL THAT IS PLACED INSIDE AND IGNITED BY A COMBUSTION SOURCE AT THE BOTTOM | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | BARBECUE AND SCRUBBING UTENSILS, NAMELY, HANDHELD ABRASIVE SCRUBBING BLOCKS FOR USE WITH BARBECUE GRILLS, SPATULAS, BASTING BRUSHES AND GRILL CLEANING BRUSHES; COOKWARE, NAMELY, WOKS AND WOK COVERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | TABLECLOTHS NOT OF PAPER; BARBECUE MITTS | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | APRONS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kingsford Products Company, The
- Other trademarks owned by Kingsford Products Company, The
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named KINGSFORD PRO
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 17, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 23, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 22, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 25, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 20, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 15, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |