USPTO serial 75842911
DISCOVER WHAT YOU KNOW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HICKEY, SUSAN E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DISCOVER WHAT YOU KNOW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark B. Harrison
MARK B HARRISON VENABLEP O BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043-9998UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE BY BUSINESSES TO MANAGE AND SHARE INFORMATION AND DATA OVER THE INTERNET OR OVER INTERNAL OR ORGANIZATIONAL COMPUTER NETWORKS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE BY BUSINESSES FOR ELECTRONIC MESSAGING OVER THE INTERNET OR OVER INTERNAL OR ORGANIZATIONAL COMPUTER NETWORKS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR FACILITATING REAL-TIME ELECTRONIC INTERACTION AMONG COMPUTER USERS OVER AN INTERNAL COMPUTER NETWORK TO ENABLE COLLABORATION ON BUSINESS PROJECTS; AND USER MANUALS SOLD AS A UNIT | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | HOSTING SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS FOR OTHERS ON A COMPUTER SERVER FOR A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; COMPUTER SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS DEPLOYMENT FOR OTHERS ON A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LOTUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by LOTUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named DISCOVER WHAT YOU KNOW
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 24, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 18, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 26, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 6, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 27, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 15, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2001 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Feb 12, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 31, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 31, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 19, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |