USPTO serial 75842984
EPIXTECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAPPENFIELD, ANN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EPIXTECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alan H. Garfield
ALAN H GARFIELD GARFIELD & MEREL, LTD223 W JACKSONCHICAGO, IL 60606-6908UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in information retrieval, research applications, data indexing and information management and library automation in the fields of education, library science, business administration, business management and education | ACTIVE | Feb 22, 2000 |
| 035 | Computer services, namely providing information in the field of marketing, advertising, business management and business administration, via the Internet | ACTIVE | Feb 22, 2000 |
| 036 | Computer services namely providing information in the field of financial and monetary affairs, and real estate, via the Internet | ACTIVE | Feb 22, 2000 |
| 041 | Computer services namely providing information in the field of educational affairs and library automation services, namely making library information available via the Internet | ACTIVE | Feb 22, 2000 |
| 042 | Computer services, namely providing information in the field of scientific, medical and legal research via the Internet | ACTIVE | Feb 22, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Dynix Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Dynix Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named EPIXTECH
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 18, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 12, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 11, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 17, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 28, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 20, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 4, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Nov 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 16, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |