USPTO serial 75843075
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
CATHEDRAL CITY, CA
CATHEDRAL CITY, CA
CATHERDRAL CITY, CA
CATHERDRAL CITY, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas W. Cook
Thomas W. Cook Thomas Cook Intellectual Property AttorneysP. O. Box 1989Sausalito, CA 94966UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | STORAGE OF AUTOMOBILES FOR PROTECTION AND UNDER GUARDED AREAS FOR SAFE KEEPING | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 5, 1990 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2024 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 30, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2013 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2013 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 11, 2013 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 11, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 4, 2013 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2013 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jul 9, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 2, 2009 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 12, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 24, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 15, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 15, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 12, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 20, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 31, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 4, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 20, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 10, 2001 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Nov 6, 2001 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |