USPTO serial 75843114
ACCUNET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 13, 2007
- Examiner
- MAYES, LAURIE ANN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with ACCUNET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc.
Santa Clara, CA, US
Other trademarks owned by Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc.
Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc.
Santa Clara, CA, US
Other trademarks owned by Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc.
ABBOTT CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS INC.
SANTA CLARA, CA, US
Other trademarks owned by ABBOTT CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS INC.
Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc.
Santa Clara, CA, US
Other trademarks owned by Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc.
ABBOTT CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS, INC.
SANTA CLARA, CA, US
Other trademarks owned by ABBOTT CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS, INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anamaria E. Cashman
Anamaria E. Cashman ABBOTT LABORATORIES100 Abbott Park RoadABBOTT PARK, IL 60064UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical devices to be used for embolic protection consisting of a guide wire with a filter | ACTIVE | Aug 31, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ABBOTT CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ABBOTT CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named ACCUNET
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 10, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 10, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 19, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 6, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 5, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 23, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 9, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 2, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 13, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 13, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 2, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 1, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2004 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 28, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 19, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 8, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 27, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 7, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 16, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 23, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |