USPTO serial 75843132
ABACUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HERMANSEN, AMY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ABACUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lucy B. Arant
LUCY B ARANT RUSS, AUGUST, KABAT & KENT12424 WILSHIRE BLVD12TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90025Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR TESTING COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS AND EQUIPMENT BY GENERATING AND SWITCHING TELEPHONE TRAFFIC | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 13, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 19, 2001 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 19, 2001 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 25, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 26, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 10, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 1961 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |