Drawing for FAIRMARKET NETWORK

USPTO serial 75843305

FAIRMARKET NETWORK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUTLER, MIDGE
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FAIRMARKET NETWORK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROBERT M. O'CONNELL, JR.

FRANCINE M HANSON COOLEY GODWARD LLP20TH FLONE MARITIME PLZSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3580

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035ELECTRONIC AUCTION SERVICES RENDERED VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; PLACEMENT OF ADVERTISEMENTS FOR OTHERS ON WEB SITES; PROVIDING INFORMATION IN THE NATURE OF LISTINGS OF THE PRODUCTS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS AVAILABLE OR SOUGHT FOR SALE VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 10, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 10, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 18, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 24, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 4, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 8, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 8, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 23, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 23, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 8, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 1, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 16, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 16, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 16, 2001UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 22, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 17, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 18, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 24, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance