Drawing for ORIGINAL RADEBERGER BITTER FUR HERVORRAGENDE LEISTAUGEN AUSSTELLUNG FUR GASTWIRTSGEWERBE, HEIMISCHE INDUST[RIE UND] KUNST. EHRENPREIS DER STADE RADEBERG. 8.-17. JUNI 1912 EHRENPREIS DES SACHSISCHEN GASTWIRTVERBANDES. FUR V[ERDIENST] VOLLE LEISTUNGEN. KAME

USPTO serial 75843563

ORIGINAL RADEBERGER BITTER FUR HERVORRAGENDE LEISTAUGEN AUSSTELLUNG FUR GASTWIRTSGEWERBE, HEIMISCHE INDUST[RIE UND] KUNST. EHRENPREIS DER STADE RADEBERG. 8.-17. JUNI 1912 EHRENPREIS DES SACHSISCHEN GASTWIRTVERBANDES. FUR V[ERDIENST] VOLLE LEISTUNGEN. KAME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2833496Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 20, 2004
Examiner
MATTESSICH, DANIELLE
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with ORIGINAL RADEBERGER BITTER FUR HERVORRAGENDE LEISTAUGEN AUSSTELLUNG FUR GASTWIRTSGEWERBE, HEIMISCHE INDUST[RIE UND] KUNST. EHRENPREIS DER STADE RADEBERG. 8.-17. JUNI 1912 EHRENPREIS DES SACHSISCHEN GASTWIRTVERBANDES. FUR V[ERDIENST] VOLLE LEISTUNGEN. KAME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert A. Vanderhye

ROBERT A VANDERHYE NIXON & VANDERHYE PC1100 N GLEBE RD 8TH FLARLINGTON, VA 22201-4714UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033DISTILLED SPIRITS AND DISTILLED LIQUORSSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 26, 2010C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Jun 18, 2007CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 20, 2004R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Mar 5, 2004IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Feb 13, 20041.BDSec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED—
Feb 13, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 22, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 2, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 19, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 12, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 12, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 12, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 8, 2002REINREINSTATED—
Feb 21, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 16, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 1, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 1, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 13, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 11, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 28, 2000UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 15, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 5, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance