USPTO serial 75843711
BUILDING THE GLOBAL MARKET PLACE FOR TOMORROW'S BUSINESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ERVIN, INGA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BUILDING THE GLOBAL MARKET PLACE FOR TOMORROW'S BUSINESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
01067 Dresden, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James B. Arpin
JAMES B ARPIN BAKER & BOTTS, LLPTHE WARNER, STE 13001299 PENNSYLVANIA AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2400Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | DEVELOPING DATABASE CONNECTION SOFTWARE FOR USE IN EXCHANGING OFFERS AND CONTRACTS TO PURCHASE GOODS AND SERVICES ON A GLOBAL INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | PROVIDING COMPUTER SERVICES FOR OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF COMMERCE, NAMELY, DEVELOPING DATA PROCESSING AND DATABASE CONNECTION SOFTWARE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 17, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |