Drawing for CUSTOMER DIALOGUE SYSTEMS

USPTO serial 75843846

CUSTOMER DIALOGUE SYSTEMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WELTSCH, KEITH
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CUSTOMER DIALOGUE SYSTEMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Angelo Notaro

ANGELO NOTARO NOTARO & MICHALOS PC100 DUTCH HL RD STE 110ORANGEBURG, NY 10962-2100UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Communications software for connecting computer users to global computer networks; computer communications software that allows individual bank customers to access their own bank account information and perform transactions by accessing their own bank accounts; computer software for use by financial institutions and insurance companies to track, archive and render financial transactions and customer data; computer e-commerce software to allow users to perform electronic business transactions via a global computer network; database management software in the field of customer relationship management; multimedia computer software recorded on CD-ROM for use in customer relationship management to collect, archive and render customer data; and interactive multimedia computer software for use by automated and computer assisted customer help desks and information services to automate on-line software operation troubleshooting and technical assistance to software usersACTIVE—
042Computer consultation; installation of computer software; updating of computer software; computer software design for others; maintenance of computer software; computer programming for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 7, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 29, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 28, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 28, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 9, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 17, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 4, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 1, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 1, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 25, 2001ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 18, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 24, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 21, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 10, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance