Drawing for LETTER FROM A FRIEND

USPTO serial 75843933

LETTER FROM A FRIEND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STINE, DAVID
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LETTER FROM A FRIEND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Delynn Arneson Axelberg

P O BOX 854BIGFORK, MT 59911UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Computer services; namely providing educational information about world geography, world culture, world customs, world languages, world cuisine and world events via the global computer network for children, generally age 4 to 13, using video, audio, photographs, text, graphics and interactive programsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 1, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 30, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 29, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 14, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 20, 2003PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 5, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2003PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Jun 1, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 13, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 1, 2003PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Mar 27, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 26, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 26, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 24, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 26, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 26, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 26, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 4, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 14, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 17, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 7, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 26, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 4, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 2, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance