Drawing for HYDROGARDEN

USPTO serial 75844098

HYDROGARDEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRYAN JOHNSON, HELLEN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HYDROGARDEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Craig M. Stainbrook

CRAIG M STAINBROOK JOHNSON & STAINBROOK LLP3558 ROUND BARN BLVD STE 203SANTA ROSA, CA 95403UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021HYDROPONIC GARDENING SYSTEM COMPRISED OF A GARDENING CONTAINER WHICH USES A VARIETY OF ARTIFICIAL MEDIA TO GROW PLANTS IN AN AERATED SOLUTION OF WATER AND NUTRIENTSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 27, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 24, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 10, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 20, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 20, 2002EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Sep 26, 2002CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Sep 25, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 25, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 25, 2002ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 4, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 13, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 7, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 25, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 9, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 10, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 10, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance