USPTO serial 75844155
EXCEPTIONAL INVITES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 6, 2001
- Examiner
- THOMAS, AMY E
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EXCEPTIONAL INVITES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barry J. Parker
BARRY J PARKER CARR MCCLELLAN INGERSOLL THOMPSON & HORN216 PARK RDBURLINGAME, CA 94010UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | BOTTLED INVITATIONS, NAMELY, INVITATIONS CONTAINED IN A PLASTIC BOTTLE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 12, 1999 |
| 042 | PREPARATION OF CUSTOM BOTTLED INVITATIONS FOR OTHERS, NAMELY, PRINTING INVITATIONS AND PLACEMENT OF THE INVITATIONS INTO BOTTLES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 4, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10, 2007 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 6, 2001 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Nov 17, 2000 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 9, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |