USPTO serial 75844298
IKONISCOPE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2951932Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 17, 2005
- Examiner
- BELL, MARLENE D
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with IKONISCOPE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven J. Moore
Steven J. Moore Withers Bergman LLP157 Church Street14th FloorNew Haven, CT 06510Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | MICROSCOPES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 16, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ICONICS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by IKONISYS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by IKONISYS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by IKONISYS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named IKONISCOPE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 2025 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 17, 2024 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 2, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Feb 2, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 17, 2015 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2011 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 17, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 17, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 29, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 28, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 25, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 17, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 23, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 10, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 26, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 11, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 5, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 13, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 3, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 17, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 14, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 3, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 21, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 17, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 8, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |