USPTO serial 75844594
TRU-SCAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RADEMACHER, APRIL LUEDERS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TRU-SCAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Nedlands, 6009 Western Australia, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brett A. August
BRETT A AUGUST PATTISHALL, MCAULIFFE, NEWBURY, HILLIARD311 S WACKER DRSTE 5000CHICAGO, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | LASERS AND APPARATUSES INCORPORATING LASERS, FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL AND SURGICAL PURPOSES, NAMELY, SCANNING DELIVERY AND LASER BEAM CONTROL SYSTEMS COMPOSED OF A VARIABLE APERTURE, SCANNING, AND FIXED LENSES, SOFTWARE-DRIVEN CONTROLLERS AND DRIVER MOTORS SURGICAL LASERS-- AND APPARATUS AND PARTS AND COMPONENTS THEREFOR FOR USE IN REFRACTIVE SURGERY FOR EYE TREATMENT | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 23, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2001 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jan 29, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 25, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |