USPTO serial 75844939
VAST SOLUTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILSON, ANGELA BISHOP
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VAST SOLUTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John J. Marcoux
JOHN J MARCOUX JENKINS & GILCHRISTROSS 1445 ROSS AVE STE 3200DALLAS, TX 75202-2799UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | computer services, namely, the design and development for others of hardware and software applications which allow access to data via wireless technology | ABANDONED | Oct 4, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 28, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 2, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 19, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 18, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 24, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |