USPTO serial 75845081
SUNDAZZLER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2800614Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 30, 2003
- Examiner
- LOHR, AMY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SUNDAZZLER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Edwardsville, IL
Edwardsville, IL
EDWARDSVILLE, IL
EDWARDSVILLE, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maureen Beacom Gorman
Maureen Beacom Gorman Marshall, Gerstein & Borun LLP233 South Wacker Drive6300 Willis TowerChicago, IL 60606-6357Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | skin lotion, skin gel, skin oil, skin spray, skin cream, skin moisturizer, non-medicated skin balm, non-medicated skin ointment, and skin emollients for accelerating tans, all for use in indoor or outdoor sun tanning | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Niesciur, Thomas
- Other trademarks owned by Niesciur, Thomas
- Other trademarks owned by NIESCIUR, WILLIAM W.
- Other trademarks owned by NIESCIUR, WILLIAM W.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named SUNDAZZLER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 6, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 6, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 21, 2009 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 14, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 28, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 28, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 29, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 3, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 6, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | LSOU | LATE FILED STATEMENT OF USE | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 5, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 18, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 26, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 6, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 4, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 11, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 20, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |