Drawing for STANDARD BLOCK

USPTO serial 75845206

STANDARD BLOCK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOLD, BARBARA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STANDARD BLOCK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MICHAEL K. BOSWORTH

MICHAEL K BOSWORTH OPPENHEIMER WOLFF & DONNELLY, LLP1400 PAGE MILL RDPALO ALTO, CA 94304UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009SOFTWARE FOR DESIGN OF INTEGRATED CIRCUITSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 10, 2003PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Jan 28, 2002PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Apr 23, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 2, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 7, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 13, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance