Drawing for PACIFIC PHONE CARD

USPTO serial 75845318

PACIFIC PHONE CARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PACIFIC PHONE CARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JAMES C WRAY

1493 CHAIN BRIDGE RD STE 300MCLEAN, VA 22101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Telephone calling cards, not magnetically encodedACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 13, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 10, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 7, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 27, 2002EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Nov 23, 2001CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Aug 27, 2001RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Aug 3, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 3, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 26, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 6, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 20, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 21, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 6, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance