Drawing for INTELVISION

USPTO serial 75845486

INTELVISION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GLYNN, GERALD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INTELVISION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CHRISTOPHER J DAY

CHRISTOPHER J DAY LAW OFFICE OF CHRISTOPHER DAY340 E PALM LN STE 282PHOENIX, AZ 85004-4553UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER HARDWARE, NAMELY PROCESSORS, HARD DRIVES, RANDOM ACCESS MEMORY, CD-ROMS DRIVES, NETWORK CARDS, MODEMS, TELEVISION CARDS AND MONITORS, PACKAGED AS A UNITACTIVEFeb 15, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 8, 2002ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
May 10, 2001ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 10, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 28, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 12, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 7, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 12, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 5, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 3, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance