Drawing for GLOBAL INTERNETWORKING

USPTO serial 75845889

GLOBAL INTERNETWORKING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AXILBUND, MELVIN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GLOBAL INTERNETWORKING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAVID CHARLES MASSELLI

DAVID CHARLES MASSELLI DAVID CHARLES MASSELLI, PC4113 LEE HWYARLINGTON, VA 22207UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038END TO END TURNKEY TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS UTILIZING HIGH-SPEED BANDWITH AND LEASED LINESACTIVEOct 1, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 11, 2003PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
May 28, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
May 28, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 25, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 21, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 27, 2001PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 8, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 18, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 22, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance