USPTO serial 75845899
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
75002 Paris, FR
75002 Paris, FR
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bridgette Fitzpatrick
Bridgette Fitzpatrick Hearst Communications, Inc.959 Eighth AvenueNew York, NY 10019UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer operating system software; computer application software, namely, programs for home and office use providing word processing and office management functions, data bases, games, multimedia presentations, computer software development tools, web software development tools and web server functions for running on the operating system, and user manuals sold therewith | ABANDONED | Mar 31, 1999 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2010 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 2, 2010 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2009 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 14, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 26, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 10, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 26, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 2, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 14, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 6, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |