USPTO serial 75846047
CYBERNET GROUP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODSAID, IRA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CYBERNET GROUP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Camille M. Miller
CAMILLE M MILLER WOODCOCK WASHBURN KURTZ MACKIEWICZ ET ALONE LIBERTY PL 46TH FLPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer utility software used for business, banking, healthcare, shopping, reservations, education, government, military and household management, namely, cross-platform client/server based software for meeting coordination and interaction between remote participants; computer software allowing both freehand and constrained document mark up and collaboration; computer network communication software featuring remote interparticipant interaction via a combination of speech and video data transmittals; and computer software featuring centralized server design for file storage and retrieval, and for scheduling meetings | ACTIVE | Jan 15, 1999 |
| 035 | computerized data base management services consisting of collecting, storing and providing data for subscribers | ACTIVE | Jan 15, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2000 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 21, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |