Drawing for FTS

USPTO serial 75846080

FTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KOVALSKY, LAURA G
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

HOWARD N. ARONSON

HOWARD N ARONSON LACKENBACH SIEGELP O BOX 416SCARSDALE, NY 10583UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003SKIN SOAPS, DEODORANT SOAPS; PERFUMERIES, NAMELY, PERFUME, COLOGNE; COSMETICS, NAMELY, LIP STICK, BLUSH, ROUGE, MAKEUP, HAIR CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, SHAMPOO, CONDITIONER, HAIR GEL; SKIN CARE AND BODY CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, SKIN CREAM, SKIN CONDITIONER, BODY MASKS, BODY OILS, BODY POWDERACTIVE—
005PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS FOR THE TREATMENT OF SKIN DISEASES AND ILLNESSES, NAMELY, ANGINA, DIABETES, INSOMNIA; SANITARY NAPKINS AND SANITARY PADS; DIETETIC FOOD AND BEVERAGES ADAPTED FOR MEDICAL USE; MEDICAL PLASTERS; MATERIAL FOR STOPPING TEETH; DENTAL WAX; ALL PURPOSE DISINFECTANTS AND DISINFECTANTS FOR MEDICAL INSTRUMENTS; PREPARATIONS FOR DESTROYING VERMIN; FUNGICIDES FOR DOMESTIC AND AGRICULTURAL USE; HERBICIDES FOR DOMESTIC AND AGRICULTURAL USEACTIVE—
008NAIL FILES; ELECTRIC RAZORS, NON-ELECTRIC RAZORS; RAZORS FOR FACE, RAZORS FOR EYEBROWS, RAZORS FOR UNDERARMS, RAZORS FOR ARMS AND LEGS; RAZOR BLADES, RAZOR CASES; SCISSORS, SMALL SCISSORS FOR EYEBROWS, TWEEZERSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 9, 2004ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Oct 20, 2003EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Oct 13, 2003EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Oct 13, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 31, 2003EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 25, 2003EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 25, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 11, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 6, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 4, 2002EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 18, 2002EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 27, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 13, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 13, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 10, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 17, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 4, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 23, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 19, 2001CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 3, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 2, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 20, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 20, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 19, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 18, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 7, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance