Drawing for CONCIERGE FOR THE HOME

USPTO serial 75846801

CONCIERGE FOR THE HOME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COREA, ANDY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CONCIERGE FOR THE HOME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Timothy J. Connors

TIMOTHY J CONNORS CALFEE, HALTER & GRISWOLD LLP800 SUPERIOR AVE STE 1400CLEVELAND, OH 44114-2688UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Computerized on-line ordering services in the fields of dry-cleaning services, shoe repair, package shipping, consumer recycling, grocery items, cleaning supplies, healthcare products, beauty products, stamps, and film processingACTIVE—
039Pickup and delivery services, namely, pickup of goods from consumers, transport of those goods to consumer services providers, and delivery of those goods to consumers after servicing, all as ordered by the consumer via global computer network or telephone; specifically, pickup of clothes for dry cleaning, shoes for repair, packages for shipping, bottles and cans for redemption, and film for processing; transport of those goods to consumer service providers; and delivery to the consumer of dry cleaned clothes, repaired shoes, processed film, stamps, grocery items, cleaning supplies, healthcare products, and beauty productsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 30, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 18, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 25, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 5, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 19, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 16, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 20, 2000UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 11, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance