Drawing for BROADWING

USPTO serial 75847046

BROADWING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BORSUK, ESTHER
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BROADWING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kenneth B. Germain

KENNETH B GERMAIN FROST & JACOBS LLP2500 PNC CTR201 E FIFTH STCINCINNATI, OH 45202-4182

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009prepaid telephone calling cards, magnetically encodedACTIVE—
016telephone directoriesACTIVE—
041EDUCATION SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF SEMINARS, CONFERENCES AND WORKSHOPS IN THE AREA OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORK CONFIGURATIONACTIVE—
042PROVIDING DESIGN OF CUSTOMIZED TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS FOR OTHERS (INCLUDING VOICE, DATA AND INTERNET) AS WELL AS CONSULTATION SERVICES IN THE AREA OF GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK EXPERTISE WHICH HELPS CUSTOMERS UNDERSTAND HOW THE WIDE AREA NETWORK CONNECTS TO THEIR LOCAL AREA NETWORKS; AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE AREA OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS, NAMELY, PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND ENGINEERING, SYSTEM ASSESSMENT AND TECHNOLOGY STRATEGY, SOFTWARE APPLICATION SELECTION AND INTEGRATION, ARCHITECTURE PLANNING AND DESIGNACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 8, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 22, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 22, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 20, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 6, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 15, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 13, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 12, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 20, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 20, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 28, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 8, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 4, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 6, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 31, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 21, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 27, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 11, 1999UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance