USPTO serial 75847200
CHOLESSTOLIFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BEVERLY, JOSETTE MICHELLE
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHOLESSTOLIFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David B. Jennings
DAVID B JENNINGS ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLPONE METROPOLITAN SQ STE 2600ST LOUIS, MO 63102-2740UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | DAIRY PRODUCTS EXCLUDING ICE CREAM, ICE MILK AND FROZEN YOGURT, EDIBLE OILS AND FATS, AND YOGURT | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 11, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 15, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 3, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 27, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 3, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 11, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 22, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 31, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 23, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |