USPTO serial 75847425
UNIQUE MEDIA COLLECTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2867004Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 27, 2004
- Examiner
- ISAACSON, GINNY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with UNIQUE MEDIA COLLECTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARVIN H. KLEINBERG,
JOHN BAIRD UNIQUE MEDIA INCORPORATED120 CARLTON ST.SUITE 415TORONTO ONTARIO, M5A 4K2Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Maps, posters and postcards | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by UNIQUE MEDIA, INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks owned by UNIQUE MEDIA, INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks owned by UNIQUE MEDIA, INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named UNIQUE MEDIA COLLECTION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 21, 2010 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 21, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 9, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 18, 2010 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| May 12, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 5, 2010 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| May 4, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 27, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 17, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 13, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 28, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 17, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 12, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 31, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 21, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 19, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 8, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 31, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 10, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 8, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 25, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 23, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 13, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 21, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 15, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |