Drawing for DR. TRUCKER

USPTO serial 75847710

DR. TRUCKER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DALIER, JOHN DAVID
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with DR. TRUCKER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anthony J. Bourget,

ANTHONY J BOURGET MISFELDT, STARK, RICHIE, WICKSTROM ET AL101 PUTNAM STEAU CLAIRE, WI 54703UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005DIETARY SUPPLEMENTSACTIVE—
025CLOTHING, NAMELY SHIRTS, T-SHIRTS, SWEATSHIRTS, CAPS, AND JACKETSACTIVE—
030STAPLE FOODS, NAMELY, WHEAT-BASED SNACK FOODS, BAGELS, BAKERY GOODS, BISCUITS, BRAN, BREAD, BREAD STICKS, BREAKFAST CEREALS, BUNS, CAKES, CANDY, CHIPS, CHOCOLATE, COFFEE, COOKIES, CORN FLAKES, CHEWING GUM, CHIPS, CRACKERS, ENTREES CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF PASTA, PASTA AND RICE, FOOD BARS, CANDIED FRUIT, FRUIT SNACKS, POPCORN, HAMBURGER SANDWICHES, KETCHUP, MACARONI, MATZO, MEAT PIES, MILKSHAKES, MUFFINS, NOODLES, NUTS, OATS, PACKAGE COMBINATIONS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF BREAD AND CRACKERS, PANCAKES, PASTA, PASTIES, PASTRIES, PIES, PIZZA, POT PIES, PRETZELS, PUDDINGS, RICE, QUICHE, RAVIOLI, RICE-BASED SNACK FOODS, BREAD ROLLS, SALSA, SALAD DRESSINGS, PASTA SALAD, MEAT SANDWICHES, SAUCES, GRANOLA-BASED SNACK FOODS AND BARS, CEREAL-BASED SNACK FOODS AND BARS, WHEAT-BASED SNACK FOODS AND BARS, SNACK MIXES, FRUIT SNACKS, SPAGHETTI, SPAGHETTI SAUCE, SPICES, NATURAL SWEETENERS, SYRUPS, TACO CHIPS, TACO SHELLS, TACO, TEA, TOMATO SAUCE, TORTILLAS, WAFFLES, YOGURTACTIVE—
031NATURAL AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS, NAMELY APPLES, APRICOTS, ARTICHOKES, ASPARAGUS, BEANS, BLUEBERRIES, CORN, DATES, CABBAGE, COCONUT, DATES, EGGS, FRESH FRUITS, GINGER, FRESH HERBS, MUSHROOMS, NUTS, OATS, ONIONS, ORANGES, PEACHES, PEPPERS, POTATOES, PRAWNS, TOMATOES, VEGETABLES, ZUCCHINIACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 11, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 4, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jan 4, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 26, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 26, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 6, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 5, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance