USPTO serial 75847751
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
INDIANAPOLIS, IN
Indianapolis, IN
MIAMISBURG, OH
APRIMO MARKETING OPERATIONS UK LTD.
LONDON, GB
Other trademarks owned by APRIMO MARKETING OPERATIONS UK LTD.
INDIANAPOLIS, IN
INDIANAPOLIS, IN
INDIANAPOLIS, IN
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Holiday W. Banta
Holiday W. Banta Ice Miller LLPOne American Square, Suite 2900Indianapolis, IN 46282UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | [ COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN PLANNING, EXECUTION, AND ANALYSIS OF MARKETING ACTIVITIES IN THE FIELD OF BUSINESS, namely, FOR MANAGING AND ALLOCATING MARKETING INVESTMENT ACCOUNTS, FOR DEFINING AND REVIEWING MARKETING OBJECTIVES, FOR PREPARING MARKETING PROPOSALS, FOR EXPEDITING MARKETING REVIEWS AND APPROVALS, FOR CREATING DATABASES OF MARKETING ACTIVITIES, PROJECTS, EVENTS, CUSTOMERS, FACILITIES, FORMS, TEMPLATES, PARTICIPANTS, PROFILES AND SUPPLIERS, FOR MANAGING MARKETING CAMPAIGNS, FOR AUTOMATING COMMUNICATIONS, FOR MANAGING MARKETING EXPENSES, PROJECTS AND TRAVEL, AND FOR ANALYZING MARKETING TRENDS AND PROFITS, MEASURES AND ACTIVITY DATA ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 10, 2000 |
| 042 | [ TECHNICAL CONSULTATION AND PRODUCT SUPPORT SERVICES RELATED TO COMPUTER SOFTWARE, namely, TROUBLESHOOTING OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE PROBLEMS VIA THE TELEPHONE AND GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS ] * Software as a service (SaaS) services for use in planning, execution, and analysis of marketing activities in the field of business, namely, for managing and allocating marketing investment accounts, for defining and reviewing marketing objectives, for preparing marketing proposals, for expediting marketing reviews and approvals, for creating databases of marketing activities, projects, events, customers, facilities, forms, templates, participants, profiles and suppliers, for managing marketing campaigns, for automating communications, for managing marketing expenses, projects and travel, and for analyzing marketing trends and profits, measures and activity data; technical consultation and product support services related to computer software, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problems via the telephone and global computer networks * | ACTIVE | Jan 10, 2000 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7, 2022 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 7, 2022 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 7, 2022 | 9G8P | REGISTERED - SEC. 9 GRANTED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8 | — |
| Nov 7, 2022 | 8PRT | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 4, 2022 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Oct 20, 2022 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 12, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 2, 2022 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2022 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2022 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2019 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 21, 2019 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 31, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 31, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 10, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 7, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 24, 2012 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2012 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 24, 2012 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 24, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 13, 2012 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 31, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 31, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 9, 2002 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 28, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 25, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 28, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 8, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 1, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 31, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |