USPTO serial 75848497
SMARTCAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2606091Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 6, 2002
- Examiner
- CHARLON, BARNEY
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SMARTCAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Redflex Traffic Systems Pty Ltd
South Melbourne, Victoria 3205, AU
Redflex Traffic Systems Pty Ltd
South Melbourne, Victoria 3205, AU
SCOTTSDALE, AZ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James A. Oliff
James A. Oliff Oliff & Berridge, PLCP.O. Box 320850Alexandria, VA 22320-4850UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Traffic infringement detection and processing systems, namely, red light camera systems comprising cameras and associated image processing [, communications, detection and digital information processing ] apparatus; speed camera systems, comprising, radar and laser detection apparatus, cameras and associated digital information processing apparatus; [ traffic infringement operational systems comprising hardware and software for issuing infringement notices and controlling collection of fines; ] and image processing apparatus comprising digitizing, pattern recognition, optical character recognition, image enhancement, verification and data compression and storage hardware and software | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 22, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Redflex Traffic Systems Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Redflex Traffic Systems Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by REDFLEX TRAFFIC SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named SMARTCAM
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2013 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 4, 2009 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Mar 30, 2009 | PRA8 | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 | — |
| Mar 30, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 14, 2009 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 23, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 23, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 30, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |